Exhibition Concepts.
·
An exhibition in university, hopefully as soon
as possible.
·
Looking to exhibit new work and see artworks in
a non-studio context.
·
Annexe Project space? Need to work out the
logistics.
·
If using project space how do we fill it?
·
Do we want extra participants or to keep it just
a two man show.
·
Look to consider the political context of work
and how these ideas can be circumnavigated.
·
Dark room. Could we have a film piece?
From the success of CONTROVERTER, Oliver Perry and myself
are looking to construct another pop-up exhibition. The previous exhibition
allowed new avenues of thought and I believe that new considerations started to
appear, considerations that came about through the practical and conceptual
developments of exhibiting and curating.
Because of these positive developments that came out of
exhibiting in a group show, we have decided to exhibit again as soon as we felt
we could successfully show new work. This time, mainly due to the bureaucratic
and financial pressures of exhibiting outside of university, we have decided to
use the Annexe Project Space for a two-man show of our work. The space is
currently being used for the second year shows but we have almost managed to
procure an evening show on Tuesday 5th March. We are just looking to
finalise with the administration and security.
We believe that our work compliments the other’s practice
and will come together in the small confines of the project space. As
CONTROVERTER was located in the large open space of Bridge+Tunnel, it was able
to function in a particularly way. The work was never segregated, even Susie
Stott’s video work, which was located in a dark room attached to the main hall
felt truly connected to the other artworks. This time if we definitely use the
project space the exhibition will be completely different. The nature of the
space is that it is separated into different spaces, ideal for the second year
group shows but potentially a challenge for linking together the work of two
artists. There is also a dark room that could be interesting to use, as we both
are interested in the construction of moving image artworks. However neither
has explored it in great depth and it could be a afterthought rather than a
considered piece.
The work
Currently I would like to exhibit a few pieces, I am growing
another turf piece, this time from scratch and believe that even if it is still
in the process of growing it would provide an interesting dialogue to my
practice. Since my tutorials with Tim, Michael and Fiona I think I have a few
areas to explore and really consider which direction I want my practice to move
into. Whilst embracing ideas of landscape and the natural environment it seems
that there will always be an ecological context so perhaps I should move away
from bluntly shouting my opinions. This troubles me however as I do like the
idea of making some work that does bluntly put my considerations on the table.
This needs to act without taking anything away from the visual power of my
work. Again this is obviously something I need to give a lot of thought before
the exhibition.
I feel I have three works that I would feel comfortable
developing and eventually exhibiting. One is the turf piece that I spoke about above
and another is a piece that utilises the Perspex cubes that I failed to
construct. The half cubes that I made were not watertight and therefore drip
their contents out onto the floor. I have been thinking about using colour in
my work again, something that I have only been using for my personal aesthetic
pleasure rather than to compliment my concepts. I have been looking at creating
naturally dyed liquids, for example using beetroot and spinach. I would like to
explore an idea that directly engages with my political interests and I believe
it would be a powerful work if I can manage to successfully navigate certain
problems. I have a canvas, which I would place underneath the five half-cubes
that would be then suspended above at about head height. During the exhibition
I would pour five coloured liquids into each of the half-cubes and allow their
contents to fall onto the canvas. The liquids would be filled to different
levels and would be coloured to represent the main three political parties,
Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat and also two parties which are
commonly represented in the media, Greens and UKIP. The levels would be
representative of the each party’s environmental commitment. The canvas will
soak up the liquid and hopefully the colours will soak together, showing that
all these opinions eventually cancel each other out and form sickly mulch,
showing that the constant environmental bickering is standing in the way of
action.
Finally I would like to consider my interest in the
architectural development of space, especially when using sustainable natural
materials. Many Japanese architects have triggered off interest that I can use
to direct new movements in my practice. Sou Fujimoto has just been announced to
construct the 2013 Serpentine Pavillion and I have been looking at both his
designs and the paper based constructions of Shigeru Ban and would like to
explore this medium to construct sculptures that consider architectural space.